Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting Suggestions on Reforms for Strengthening for Periodic Assessment and Accreditation of All Higher Educational Institutions

Inviting Suggestions on Reforms for Strengthening for Periodic Assessment and Accreditation of All Higher Educational Institutions
Start Date :
May 22, 2023
Last Date :
Jun 22, 2023
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

To address the growing concerns in the present Accreditation and Ranking systems of the Government of India had constituted a High-Level Committee. This Committee considered the ...

To address the growing concerns in the present Accreditation and Ranking systems of the Government of India had constituted a High-Level Committee. This Committee considered the introduction of strategic reforms consistent with the vision of the National Education Policy 2020 and the need for adopting a simple, trust-based, objective and rationalized system for approval, accreditation and ranking of Higher Educational Institutions with a verifiable and secured centralised database through technology-driven modern systems. Methodologies for facilitating Ease of Doing Business for the stakeholders, duly facilitating students in making more informed choices for selection of institutions/ programmes were also considered by the Committee.

After a series of deliberations, a High-Level Committee has submitted its draft Report on ‘Transformative Reforms for Strengthening Periodic Assessment and Accreditation of All Higher Educational Institutions in India’ to the Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Government of India.

In light of this, MyGov, in collaboration with the Ministry of Education, seeks feedback and suggestions from all the stakeholders for the finalisation of the report.

This report has now been placed in the public domain until June 22, 2023.

Reset
Showing 826 Submission(s)
Rashmi Narasimhamurthy
Rashmi Narasimhamurthy 3 years 3 weeks ago
Most of the colleges are being superficial during NAAC assessments. Institutions are taking away original marks cards/degree certificates of students , teachers and lectures. Unnecessary obsolete courses are being conducted to mint money from students . Management wants to buy a car they conduct such courses. Admissions should be in the hands of central government and not institutions. Why is the government not fixing fees. There are middlemen for admissions in Bangalore engineering colleges. People from Kerala are setting up consultancies to get admission in Bangalore colleges. Say no engineering for students getting marks below prescribed limit. Quality of graduates is being compromised with this. RR college, chikkavara is one of such college in my opinion which is not upto the mark. They are having original degree certificates of students. This seems unethical. Please look into this institution and other institutions as well in line with the facts presented.
priti tatiya
priti tatiya 3 years 3 weeks ago
Our assessment process for higher education should be rethought, If a student could not score high marks in 12th , doesnt mean that he is not a creative persond and can not become a good architect, and can not get admission in a good institutions. So there should be different parameters to analyse the capapbilities for various courses. Architecture is more experienced based course and many others courses as well , so the pattern should be reformed
priti tatiya
priti tatiya 3 years 3 weeks ago
Dear sir, I would suggest that it is really really important to introduce assessment system for the institute, the faculty and overall environment of that institute. Govt is funding these NiTS and state level institutions and if they fail to perform well then they should be answerable. Despite of govt funding , if the infrastructure is in poor state then the institutions should answer. We have SPA & Manit, both national institutes for Architecture, if SPA is doing good ,why cant MAnit perform ? Its a big question, should be asked. What efforts are they taking to imrpove the learning process. One more thing , the govt job is taken as granted ,mOst of them think they got the regular post , so no one can touch them. So i think this mindset should be shaken, they should be answerable to the students as well as the system. they have to take efforts to do or perform better.Right now there is no system to question a govt employee , should be changed to bring in the change
Dr anjalee anil chiwhane
Dr anjalee anil chiwhane 3 years 3 weeks ago
Stop reservation criteria at least for higher education except economically weaker section ,differently ambled and wards of martyrs.Merit is killed by all other reservation.Many seeking reservation belong to creamy layer and enjoy at cost of meritorious students being sidelined.Everything Herron will fall in the right place.Faculty merits are also essential.Being a teaching faculty in medical college I have observed that the teachers themselves can’t teach at all which becomes disastrous process for students so lack of good teachers worsens students performance.Transperency in assessment by use of computer based pro metric system is the best however our system is riddled badly with question paper leak so that has to be taken care of .
jasmine gogri
jasmine gogri 3 years 3 weeks ago
Clear and Transparent Assessment Criteria: Develop clear and transparent assessment criteria that are aligned with the objectives of higher education institutions. These criteria should cover aspects such as teaching quality, research output, infrastructure, student support services, and community engagement. Emphasize Outcome-Based Education: Shift the focus from input-based assessment to outcome-based assessment. Encourage institutions to demonstrate tangible outcomes such as employability of graduates, research publications, patents, entrepreneurship, and societal impact.
jasmine gogri
jasmine gogri 3 years 3 weeks ago
Clear and Transparent Assessment Criteria: Develop clear and transparent assessment criteria that are aligned with the objectives of higher education institutions. These criteria should cover aspects such as teaching quality, research output, infrastructure, student support services, and community engagement. Emphasize Outcome-Based Education: Shift the focus from input-based assessment to outcome-based assessment. Encourage institutions to demonstrate tangible outcomes such as employability of graduates, research publications, patents, entrepreneurship, and societal impact. Continuous Evaluation: Implement a system of continuous evaluation throughout the accreditation cycle, rather than relying solely on periodic assessments. This would provide timely feedback to institutions, allowing them to identify areas of improvement and take corrective measures. Stakeholder Engagement: Involve various stakeholders, including industry representatives, alumni, students
SAKE VENKATA NARASAIAH
SAKE VENKATA NARASAIAH 3 years 3 weeks ago
It is becoming more and more common to report to the government that the employers of the educational institutions are paying more than the salaries they are giving to the teaching and non-teaching staff. To avoid all this, it would be good if the government can find out how much money has been given to the teaching and teaching staff every month through the transaction ID in the bank transaction
Mr Gunisetty Srinivasulu
Mr Gunisetty Srinivasulu 3 years 3 weeks ago
Sir ji namaskaram. Higher Education must be revamped with reforms. All students who enrol in primary education are not reaching degree/graduation level. After 76 years of independence, we could not provide public sector higher education to all. Education for all is limited to secondary education only. Technical, vocational, and work experience based higher education should be incorporated in our education.
Mr Gunisetty Srinivasulu
Mr Gunisetty Srinivasulu 3 years 3 weeks ago
Sir ji namaskaram. Higher Education must be revamped with reforms. All students who enrol in primary education are not reaching degree/graduation level. After 76 years of independence, we could not provide public sector higher education to all. Education for all is limited to secondary education only. Technical, vocational, and work experience based higher education should be incorporated in our education.